Make Me Heal, www.makemeheal.com   Plastic Surgery Recovery, Information, Cosmetic Surgery
login | view cart | my account | help | contact
 
 
 

Seven Plastic Surgery Tips to Survive the Recession

Posted on May 14th, 2009 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Anthony Youn, MD

With the recession as bad as it is (I’m hearing that some plastic surgery practices are down 80%!), I thought I’d think up some ways people may still want to get their plastic surgery… but on a budget.

Here are my Seven Plastic Surgery Tips to Survive the Recession:

7. Try Saline Implants Instead of Silicone Gel - Although not as natural-looking or feeling, saline breast implants are still nice implants, and may have a lower complication rate. They can also save you a cool grand in implant costs.

Breast Implants, Doctor Anthony Youn

 

Breast Implants, Doctor Anthony Youn

6. One Cream to Rule Them All - If you could only use one anti-aging cream for your face, it should be Retin-A. Not only does it improve acne, but it also smooths wrinkles, exfoliates, thickens collagen, and clears blemishes. And it costs less than a hundred bucks for a big tube. Do not use if you’re pregnant, though.

5. Try Sculptra instead of conventional fillers - Although not FDA-approved for general cosmetic use yet, many surgeons are using Sculptra off-label to fill in hollowness under the eyes and overall gauntness. Unlike traditional fillers which last only 6-12 months, it can last 3-5 years. Some are predicting FDA approval for general cosmetic use sometime this year.

4. Opt for Regular Lipo Over Ultrasonic or Laser Lipo - I recently returned my VASER machine since I didn’t see a significant improvement over traditional liposuction in my patients, therefore not justifying the higher price tag. I have the same opinion of laser liposuction, with which some unscrupulous practitioners claim is comparable to a facelift.

3. Try Chemical Peels Instead of Lasers - A good TCA peel (like the Blue Peel) is comparable to laser treatments, but carries a much smaller pricetag. Whereas a laser can cost $150,000 to purchase, what are the costs for the supplies of a generic TCA peel? A couple bucks.

Chemical Peel, Doctor Anothony Youn

2. A Little Botox Goes a Long Way - Many patients are saving money on Botox by using a smaller amount and spreading it out over multiple areas. Instead of injecting 20 units in the forehead, they may have 10 units in the forehead and 10 units in the frown lines. The actress Jenny McCarthy recently admitted to People Magazine that she prefers frequent injections of smaller amounts of Botox.

1. Let Your Insurance Pay For It - Do not take this wrong. Health insurance will not pay for your breast augmentation, tummy tuck, or facelift, BUT it might pay for your upper eyelid lift if you can prove the excess skin of your eyelids severely disturbs your vision. It may also pay for your breast reduction, if your breasts are massive and create severe pain. If you are unsure whether your surgery will be covered by insurance, ask yourself if you want it truly for cosmetic reasons or to treat a medical condition. If it is the latter, then call your insurance company and see if they may pay for it.

About the Author

Dr. Anthony Youn, Plastic SurgeonDr. Anthony Youn is a Michigan-based board-certified plastic surgeon, and a member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. He has been featured on E! Television’s Dr. 90210 and Celebrity Plastic Surgery, The Montel Williams Show, Fox News Channel, The O’Reilly Factor and quoted in US Weekly, In Touch, Life & Style Weekly, RADAR magazine, MSNBC, OK! Weekly, and Star Magazine discussing a wide range of plastic surgery issues. His blog Celebrity Cosmetic Surgery is the most read blog by a plastic surgeon in the country and has received nearly 6 million hits. Learn more about Dr. Anthony Youn.

 

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Want a Facelift? Call this Dentist

By Patty Kovacs, Editor-at-Large, Makemeheal.com

Back in the 1980’s Sam Muslin, DDS, MAGD, a practicing Santa Monica dentist, was testing a then unknown product called veneers to enhance the smile of a select group of his patients. What is today known as cosmetic dentistry began with pioneering expert dentist like Dr. Muslin.

Dr. Muslin’s continued application of veneers and his meticulous assessment and rebuilding of teeth to achieve a more aesthetically pleasing smile led him to perfect his art of beautiful dentistry. Developing his own signature style, he began to notice that specific applications produced distinguished, improved facial dimension. His dental work was transforming receding chins, sunken jaws, and thinning lips into stronger chins, sculpted jaws, and fuller lips. With his unique methods and dental expertise, he was creating gorgeous smiles and turning back the clock on otherwise sagging, aging faces.

He called the procedure Face Lift Dentistry as word got out and patient after patient came to him from around the country for state-of-the-art cosmetic dentistry and facial rejuvenation without plastic surgery.

Face Lift Dentistry is a unique, patient-centered, restorative, and bite-reconstructive treatment that requires only dental restorations, no actual facial surgery, yet utterly remarkable facial rejuvenation is naturally achieved. No stitches, no cosmetic injectables, and minimal to zero grinding down of the patient’s natural teeth. The procedure can be completed in as little as two office visits. Face Lift Dentistry is a level of care that exceeds all previous levels, the highest, most complex level of dental care made possible by improvements in advanced technology using Dr. Muslin’s refined techniques. This super specialty procedure is highly concentrated, utilizing and coordinating the most advanced dental technologies available to achieve the ultimate level of individualized dental care while also achieving astonishing facial rejuvenation.

“What are my goals of Face Lift Dentistry?” asks Dr. Muslin. “To achieve the absolute best jaw position and comfort, tooth angle, dental health level, clear speech, ideal facial support and optimal facial length possible. The result? A weak chin appears stronger, a short, round face is elongated, a collapsed bite is restored, and a remarkably improved facial profile results. That’s why I call it Face Lift Dentistry.”

Facelift, Cosmetic Dentistry

I met Dr. Sam Muslin at a medical luncheon at the Regent Beverly Hills, sure that I would discern his technique to be somewhat questionable. He quickly proved me wrong and now I’m a fan. His results are astonishing. Facial wrinkles and weaknesses become more obvious with age. When you think about it, it just makes good sense to incorporate enhancing one’s smile and facial dimensions simultaneously. Big plus? No surgery. Dr. Muslin is going far beyond conventional dentistry and his before-and-after patient photos and testimonials tell the story.

“The Dental Face Lift technique plumps the appearance of thinning lips, adds volume to sunken cheeks, elongates an otherwise weak jaw and chin, and makes taut that ugly, loose turkey neck. The technique naturally enhances the patient’s unique soft facial tissue with restructure of the hard tissue: the teeth. In other words, it’s much more than a ‘dental smile makeover,’” he explains.

A careful, three-dimensional analysis of the patient’s entire face geometry begins the initial procedure. A highly customized course is determined to reconstruct the patient’s bite as well as to enhance the patient’s entire facial structure. No surgery is required on the face or any soft tissues. Only the teeth are treated.

Facelift, Cosmetic Dentistry

“The development Face Lift Dentistry actually allows a patient to change what nature created and turn back the hands of time. Instead of being satisfied with the length of our face and the position of our jaw that we grew into randomly at a young age, we can now utilize this dental technology to achieve the best possible face, lips and jaw position possible while restoring youthfulness to the entire face,” says Dr. Muslin.

The procedure restructures the face, the bite, even the health of the entire body by maximizing the potential of the teeth to support the overall facial structure, lips and cheeks. It removes years off the facial appearance, vertically lengthening the face, actually smoothing out wrinkles, giving a naturally thicker appearance to the lips. Not only is the smile vastly improved, but the entire face is transformed to a far more aesthetically pleasing and youthful appearance by reconstruction the teeth. The teeth are lengthened to achieve a longer face and this lengthening process is harmonized with the specific requirements of the patient’s jaw-joint or TMJ. According to Dr. Muslin, in most instances the jaw-joint will move itself to the best position naturally if given the opportunity during the course of dental care.

Dental Facelift, Face Lift

“Wearing down of the teeth because of bruxism (grinding) is a normal process of aging. The gradual loss of vertical dimension in a patient’s face is an added result of getting older; in other words, our faces get shorter as we age because of tooth wear,” explains Dr. Muslin. “Over time, the bite is flattened and depressed facial structure follows. A face looks older due greatly to loss of tooth support and flattening of the bite. Mine is the only procedure that actually lengthens the face permanently and creates a lasting, vertically enhanced, youthful looking face.”

Dr. Muslin’s patients aren’t just aging baby boomers. A 30-year-old patient can actually have a 50-year-old looking face due to a deep over-bite and years of grinding. Short, dark yellow teeth from smoking, partying, poor eating habits, or childhood antibiotics combined with old fillings and crowns that don’t match can make a thirty-something look, well, old.

“Some of us never had a good bite to begin with. Our bite is formed in early adolescence once all of the adult teeth erupt. It’s our teeth that determine facial length and jaw position for the rest of our lives. Our faces can be short and round if the teeth don’t provide adequate support. Many of my patients experience enormous relief from migraine headaches due to teeth misalignment and grinding” continues Dr. Muslin.

Face Lift, Cosmetic Dentist

As soon as mismatched crowns and fillings are replaced, the patient is made healthier. Decay is removed for maximum health and the bite is rebuilt. Conflicting metals and decaying tooth structures are replaced with biologically compatible porcelain materials.

Worn down cusps are rebuilt and restored for better chewing, adding subtle, three-dimensional vertical facial height, creating astonishing youthful restoration of the patient’s entire facial appearance. No surgery, no stitches, and most patients go back to work the very next day.

Dr. Muslin’s years of knowledge and expertise are critical in in Face Lift Dentistry. His advanced training and artistic ability are vital components for the biological harmony of this highly advanced procedure.

Dr. Sam Muslin, Cosmetic Dentist

Dr. Sam Muslin is a Master of the Academy of General Dentistry and has been awarded by the International College of Dentists. He has been practicing cosmetic dentistry in Santa Monica for almost 30 years. Dental Face Lift and Face Lift Dentistry are registered trademarks of Dr. Sam Muslin. www.faceliftdentistry.com.

Patty Kovas, Cosmetic Dentistry

Patty Kovacs, Editor-At-Large at Makemeheal.com, is a published author and beauty expert. Patty is the Executive Producer/Host of The Health and Beauty Revolution Show on wsRadio. Her 800+ interviews include over 450 New York Times best-selling authors.

See Patty’s Websites: www.pattykovacevich.com

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Overview Of Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures Part One: Non-Surgical Nose Job

Posted on February 2nd, 2009 in Facial Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews, Procedures & Breakthroughs by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Alexander Rivkin, M.D.

Traditional cosmetic procedures such as rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, facelifts, and chin augmentations are no longer the only option for individuals who wish to enhance their outward appearance. These surgical procedures are now in competition with the latest innovations in injectable filler techniques. Products such as Radiesse, Artefill, Juvederm, and Sculptra allow a skilled physician to gently mold and sculpt the face. Facial fat disappears as we age, changing our appearance from full and youthful to gaunt and fatigued looking. Fillers will replace that fat, giving us back the youthful fullness that is lost over time. In addition, fillers can easily soften and camouflage aesthetic irregularities of the face, such as a nasal bump or an asymmetric chin. With so many new choices in aesthetic medicine available, why endure painful, invasive surgery that requires anesthesia and an overnight hospital stay? In this article I would like to specifically focus on Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty, also known as the Non-Surgical Nose Job, and discuss some of the procedure’s advantages relative to surgical rhinoplasty techniques.

As a surgically trained otolaryngologist/facial plastic surgeon I understand my patients fears and anxieties associated with “going under the knife.” I have devoted my career to developing cosmetic surgery alternatives in order to reduce recovery time, discomfort, and financial cost to patients seeking cosmetic improvements. Recent developments in aesthetic medicine have allowed me to focus on minimally invasive facial sculpting as new varieties of injectable fillers are becoming more readily available in the US market. Four years ago, I was the first in the United States to offer Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty using injections of Radiesse to raise the bridge of the nose and camouflage bumps. Since then, I have performed about 1000 successful procedures and have trained physicians across the country and abroad.

The idea of correcting nasal abnormalities with the use of injections is actually not new. In the mid 1800’s doctors attempted to perform this procedure with substances like paraffin, silicone, and goose grease. These techniques did not last because the substances used caused long-term side effects and turned out to be inappropriate for injection. However, the idea of performing rhinoplasty with injections remained a possibility and modern cosmetic surgeons continued to experiment with the idea of minimally invasive facial sculpting.

When I started using Radiesse to fill in lines and wrinkles, I was impressed with the longevity and smoothness of the results. I had heard rumors that Asian plastic surgeons were using fillers to contour the nose non-surgically and I recognized the possibility that American patients could obtain results similar to traditional rhinoplasty without surgery. I questioned why US surgeons were only offering fillers as a post-rhinoplasty corrective procedure. There was (and still is for the most part) a perception that an operation is the only way to correct cosmetic nasal irregularities, even the most minor bumps or asymmetries. After using injectable fillers as an alternative to rhinoplasty for four years, I am convinced that the Non-Surgical Nose Job is a procedure that is safe and effective with significantly less discomfort and risk than traditional rhinoplasty.

With proper administration from a trained specialist, Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty can effectively correct a mild to moderate bump on the bridge of the nose, a mild to moderate drooping of the nasal tip (nasal tip ptosis), mild to moderate post-rhinoplasty asymmetry, and mild to moderate deformities such as “boxer’s nose” or an upward scooping of the nasal tip (also known as saddle nose deformity). Skill and experience are required if a physician wishes to correct more difficult situations such as asymmetric nostril shape, or poor definition at the point between the face and nostril wing.

Dr. Rivkin, Nose Job

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Cosmetic concerns often vary between ethnic groups and the Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty procedure can present the best solution across cultural lines. For example, Asians often desire a heightened bridge of the nose and want better nasal definition. African Americans, like Asians, often request bridge augmentation while Hispanic Americans frequently ask for correction of a droopy nasal tip or irregular bump. Caucasians most commonly request camouflage for an obvious hump or unbalanced appearance of the nasal bridge.

Dr. Rivkin, Rhinoplasty

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Individuals who have already received a traditional rhinoplasty procedure commonly ask for minor corrections of asymmetry, augmentation for an upward slope of the nose, and, occasionally, a desire for augmentation and camouflage in the of the nose bridge due to a post procedure cartilage collapse.

There are several injectable fillers available on the US market today that are safe, effective and relatively long lasting. I have mostly used Radiesse and am very comfortable with this filler. Radiesse is composed of calcium hydroxyapatite microspheres in a polysaccharide gel carrier. Since there is no way to dissolve the material, it must be injected with great care. I routinely under-correct because over correction is quite difficult to resolve. Immediately after injection, Radiesse is malleable and I will contour and shape it according to the needs of the individual patient. Generally I see patients one to two weeks after the initial procedure so that I can administer touch ups if necessary. Radiesse is a semi-permanent filler and generally lasts between 10 and 12 months. Because Radiesse is not animal based, no allergy testing is required.

Some patients choose to start with more temporary hyaluronic acid fillers such as Restalyne or Juvederm in order to experiment with the outcome of their cosmetic makeover. The advantage to the hyaluronic acids is that they can be easily reversed with an enzyme in the rare event that results are dissatisfactory. After trying out their new look with temporary fillers, patients can then choose to go with a permanent filler if they decide a re-contoured nose suits their expectations (which is the case with most people). Restalyne and Juvederm last between six to nine months and are non-animal based so skin testing is not necessary and allergic reactions are unheard of.

Although the Non -Surgical alternative to rhinoplasty is an excellent option for many, it is not the best solution for all patients. Patients with a severely crooked nose may not be good candidates for an injection rhinoplasty because the augmentation needed to give a straighter appearance to the nose may make the nose too wide. Patients with a nose that is disproportionately large may need to opt for a traditional reduction surgery. The procedure will not correct breathing problems.

As with any medical procedure, selecting the right physician to perform your Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty is critical. Injecting filler into the nose must be done with care and a thorough understanding of both nasal anatomy and the properties of the filler being used. A patient contemplating this procedure should make sure his or her physician has had specific training and experience in cosmetic injection techniques, especially if the doctor is not a formally trained aesthetic surgeon. Precise knowledge about the injection spots, depth, and amount of filler needed is very important for the success of the procedure.

Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty is a relatively painless procedure that requires minimal downtime and post-procedure care. In fact many of my patients have resumed normal activities immediately after their Non-Surgical Nose Job, returning to work or a busy social calendar on the same day as the appointment. Slight bruising or swelling may occur at the site of injection, however the severity of the inflammation pales in comparison to the aftermath of traditional rhinoplasty. If discoloration or tenderness does occur, it usually disappears within a few days.

Topical anesthesia is adequate for pain control and icing the nasal area just before injection reduces the chances of bruising. I suggest patients take Arnica Montana orally after their injection – it works well for reducing any swelling or bruising that may follow. Patients can use Tylenol, but should not use non-steroidal anti inflammatory medications (Advil, Alleve, etc) for 3 days or wear sunglasses for 2 weeks after the procedure. No other limitations are required. The Non-Surgical Nose Job usually takes between 10-15 minutes to perform. Patients are usually in the office for about an hour, however, when we figure in the time needed for topical numbing cream.

Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty costs a fraction of the price of the surgical procedure. Depending the on the filler being used - temporary, semi-permanent, or permanent - a Non-Surgical Nose Job costs between $1,000 - $2,000.

Minimally invasive procedures like Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty are quickly gaining popularity because they offer patients exactly what they want cosmetically, but with much less pain, downtime, and cost. The Non-Surgical Nose Job is currently performed throughout much of the world and will only increase in popularity as the possibility of non-surgical aesthetic corrections continue to be publicized.

About the Author

Dr. Alexander Rivkin, Facial Cosmetic SurgeonAlexander Rivkin M.D. is a Yale trained facial cosmetic surgeon and UCLA faculty member who focuses exclusively on providing his patients with the latest in non-invasive, non-ablative cosmetic treatments. As an international authority on non-surgical cosmetic treatments, he divides his time between patient care, clinical research, educating other physicians, media appearances, and lecturing at scientific conferences throughout the world. Dr. Rivkin was the first physician in the country to offer the Non-Surgical Nose Job, his signature method for non-invasive correction of cosmetic nasal irregularities. He has been featured throughout the national and international media on shows such as the TODAY show, the Tyra Banks Show and EXTRA for the innovative procedures he has invented. Dr. Rivkin is a member of the teaching faculty of the American Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery. He is also a prominent member of the national teaching faculties for Allergan, Contura, Johnson and Johnson, Medicis and Bioform. Click here to learn more about Dr. Alexander Rivkin.

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Top 9 Plastic Surgery Predictions For 2009

Posted on January 7th, 2009 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews, Procedures & Breakthroughs by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Anthony Youn, MD

As a cosmetic plastic surgeon, I often have patients ask me what’s the latest on the horizon in the field of plastic surgery. Are there procedures that they should save for? In the near future will there be cheaper and easier ways to change their look than what we are currently doing now?

Here are my Top 9 Plastic Surgery Predictions for 2009:

#9. Plastic Surgery Vacations will become more and more popular. As our country falls into recession, greater and greater numbers of people will save money by combining plastic surgery and vacations. Americans will travel to Mexico, Brazil, and even India in an attempt to save money and look better. I predict that this trend will unfortunately bring about an unprecedented number of disturbing complications, as people bring their botched results back to the U.S. for American plastic surgeons to treat. The lucky ones, however, will come back looking both rested AND younger.

#8. Fat, from both from animals and people, will become a new Green resource. There are reports that a renegade Beverly Hills radiologist used liposuction fat to power his SUV to work each day. While this is an extreme example, I do believe that the work on Biofuels will continue, with liposuction fat on the periphery of this trend. No, I don’t plan on ever doing this.

#7. Sculptra will gain FDA approval as a liquid facelift for the general population. With the realization that facial volume loss is an integral component of the aging process, Sculptra treatments may take center stage in the fight against facial gauntness. Sculptra is currently only FDA-approved for treatment of HIV-associated facial wasting, but has been used in Europe for many years under the name Newfill. It is currently the only injectable filler that can produce generalized volume replacement in the face without excessive cost.

#6. 2009 will bring with it a plethora of new extreme, bizarre, and unusual plastic surgeries. 2008 brought us such plastic surgery oddities as cosmetic leg lengthening, the G Shot, the Boob Jab, and the Acupuncture Facelift. I expect fringe medical practitioners to do the same in 2009. Can we expect to see actual rib removal to thin the body, removal of the omentum (fat around the intestines) to decrease a protuberant tummy, or tummy tucks performed at the time of C-sections? Not by me!

#5. Will Gummy Bear Implants Boost Busts in 2009? In November 2006 the FDA lifted the ban on silicone gel implants. Since then plastic surgeons and patients in the know have been waiting for FDA approval of the form-stable, “gummy bear” breast implants, the only silicone breast implants that did not receive approval two years ago. These firm, textured, tear-drop shaped implants are made to retain their shape and not conform to the shape of surrounding tissues. They are already in widespread use throughout many other countries in the world. Will the FDA approve these implants for general cosmetic use in 2009? Thousands of plastic surgeons and patients hope so.

#4: Nonsurgical Liposuction Techniques Run Rampant… As Do Disappointing Results. One of the hottest procedures today is nonsurgical liposuction. Cosmetic practices throughout the country are advertising fat reduction via injections, external lasers, external ultrasound, and even by freezing the fat (called cryolipolysis). While these techniques sound intriguing, none have actually been proven to safely work…yet. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) is currently conducting an FDA-approved study on Lipodissolve, with the initial results due in the near future. While the only proven way to safely and effectively remove fat is via liposuction, 2009 may bring considerable advances to some of these, so far, unproven modalities. I expect that most will fall by the wayside, although a few may be proven to safely work.

#3: Eyelash Enhancing Medication “Latisse” Hits Big in a Blink. Recently an FDA advisory panel recommended approval for this eyelash stimulating medication from Allergan, the makers of Botox. Peak sales are estimated to reach $500 million, as this treatment will be a one of a kind. I expect Allergan will see huge profits from this topical medication, as will the physicians that dispense it. And people will walk around with Tammy Faye Baker eyes…

#2: Stem Cells are the Future in the U.S., but the Present in Other Countries. Stem cells are currently all the rage in potentially curing cancers, developmental abnormalities, and other medical problems… but are they the future for plastic surgery as well? Actually, stem cells are currently being used by some pioneering (and possibly reckless) surgeons outside the U.S. Dr. Vincent Giampapa introduced a stem cell facelift in France back in October and a handful of surgeons are performing breast enhancement with stem cells in Japan and Europe. So will we see stem cells being used by plastic surgeons in the U.S. in 2009? Not likely. The FDA is cautious with allowing procedures like these to be performed here in the States, and with good reason. Scientists need to prove that the use of stem cells for indications like these is safe and effective before allowing patients to undergo it. Until then, Americans will need to travel abroad for these extremely controversial treatments.

#1: Botox-Competitor Reloxin will act as an Economic Bailout for Millions of Botox Users in 2009. FDA approval for Medicis’s cosmetic botulinum toxin Reloxin is expected sometime in the new year. This may prove to be a relief to patients and plastic surgeons who have been forced to buy Botox at increasing prices each year. I currently charge my patients $650 for Botox injections to three areas, and the price of the Botox product itself accounts for at least half of that charge. Reloxin will be the first legitimate Botox competitor to challenge Allergan’s monopoly on this market, and hopefully bring prices down for the most popular cosmetic treatment in the U.S. It can end up being an economic bailout for the millions of people who undergo cosmetic botulinum toxin treatments several times a year.

 

About the Author

Dr. Anthony Youn, Plastic SurgeonDr. Anthony Youn is a Michigan-based board-certified plastic surgeon, and a member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. He has been featured on E! Television’s Dr. 90210 and Celebrity Plastic Surgery, The Montel Williams Show, Fox News Channel, The O’Reilly Factor and quoted in US Weekly, In Touch, Life & Style Weekly, RADAR magazine, MSNBC, OK! Weekly, and Star Magazine discussing a wide range of plastic surgery issues. His blog Celebrity Cosmetic Surgery is the most read blog by a plastic surgeon in the country and has received nearly 6 million hits. Learn more about Dr. Anthony Youn.

 

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Labiaplasty (Vaginoplasty): A Feminine Prerogative

Posted on December 4th, 2008 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Charles Gruenwald, MD

Introduction

Genital cosmetic surgery for women, often referred to as Labiaplasty or vaginoplasty, has been quietly gaining popularity throughout the United States, as well as abroad. Although labia reduction, performed as a treatment for confirmed surgical conditions of the labia, has been used by surgeons for over half a century, its refinement into an aesthetic surgical procedure for female genitalia, which is now called Labiaplasty, has evolved most significantly during the past decade. This has resulted in the introduction of several new techniques for this procedure, published in the plastic surgical literature, and each touting certain advantages. The mainstream media has, likewise, picked up on this rising Labiaplasty popularity with sporadic superficial treatment of this topic in various articles and shows.

Why the Increased Interest in Labiaplasty?

To what factors can we attribute this increasing popularity of Labiaplasty? I’m unaware of any scientific or statistical studies exploring the varied reasons for which women seek Labiaplasty, but there is considerable anecdotal information that has been provided by patients.

I try to relate the increasing interest toward this surgery to the constantly changing social trends affecting women across the country, and I feel there are at least four areas that likely motivate this ever increasing number of women to decide upon undergoing a Labiaplasty. Let’s see if you don’t agree.

There are many women who experience the problem of physical pain and irritation of the labia minora, aggravated by efforts to participate in a physically active lifestyle. Once the sensitive and more fragile labia minora protrude beyond the protection of the more resilient labia majora, they are subject to greater contact with external forces. Whether it’s biking, horseback riding, “spinning” or simply the wearing of tight fitting clothing (e.g. designer jeans) or required sports attire (e.g. scuba gear), prolonged labial irritation, from recurring pressure and friction, discourages the participation in these activities by affected women. Those are but a few of the many examples of causes of labial discomfort frequently expressed by patients.

Another motivation for women to seek labiaplasty is the humiliation of having their labia unintentionally exposed to public view when wearing certain styles or fashions of clothing. Consider for example thong bathing suits or sheer panties. In many women with bodies which would otherwise be very suitable for such attire, the presence of protruding labia minora prevent them from even considering such revealing articles of clothing.

Next is the impact of “Brazilian Grooming” of a woman’s pubic region. With this current trend of shaving, waxing or laser hair removal, an absence of pubic hair means a clear visibility of labial detail, as well as any protrusion of the labia minora, beyond their naturally hidden location (within the confines of the labia majora). This gives meaning to what is now, at times, requested as the “Barbie Doll Look” by prospective Labiaplasty patients. Without the veil of an ample presence of pubic hair, many women are extremely embarrassed by the degree to which their labia minora are now plainly evident.

Finally, we must consider what exactly does fall into the realm of “normal” when referring to labial appearance. From a biologic or medical standpoint, labia minora as well as labia majora occur in a wide range of size and shape. All of this variation is quite normal, unless there is an underlying genetic or hormonal disorder. The fact that some women simply possess longer or shorter labia minora and even fatter or thinner labia majora, is not reason, in itself, for them to seek a surgical change. If these women are comfortable with the appearance of their genital area, a cosmetic Labiaplasty is unwarranted. However, there now exists a rapidly changing public perception of what’s normal and, hence, the appearance that some women seek is becoming more focused. This is brought about by the detailed scrutiny of other’s genital appearance, now possible through many media sources. Today, the naked human body is easily viewed in movies, magazines and websites, as well as during the sharing by young women of open shower and locker room facilities, providing little or no privacy. Through these “eye opening” experiences, women begin to acquire an altered impression of “normal” genital appearance, setting the stage for personal embarrassment, that naturally follows, if they feel their own appearance differs significantly from what they are seeing in others. This humiliation becomes the compelling reason for many women to consider Labiaplasty.

With these trends, as well as others, taking place, it comes as no surprise that Labiaplasty is becoming increasingly popular. The next obvious question is how this procedure is performed.

The Surgical Procedures

Although the terms Labiaplasty and Vaginoplasty are frequently used as a collective terms to mean several different cosmetic surgical procedures for the female genitalia, Labiaplasty is used most frequently to refer to surgical reduction of labia minora, when they protrude to an undesirable extent. Less commonly, plastic surgical alteration of the labia majora (labia majora reduction, liposuction or fat injection of the labia majora) is performed. Finally there are ancillary Labiaplasty procedures to alter either the exposure of the clitoris or its hood (clitoral hood reduction, clitoral hoodectomy or clitoropexy), which are occasionally performed in conjunction with Labiaplasty of the labia minora. To avoid confusion, I will use the simple term, Labiaplasty, hereinafter, to just imply cosmetic surgical reduction of the labia minora. I will refer to the other labial procedures by their more specific terms.

There are two basic techniques by which Labiaplasty is performed, and I will briefly describe each.

The first technique is that called the “trim” method of Labiaplasty which resembles the original labia reduction technique, used decades ago. This is a surgical amputation (removal) of the protruding portion of the labia minora. It was often performed in past years hurriedly and without much attention to detail. This, of course, produced the desired labial reduction, but not an aesthetically pleasing result. However, when performed by skilled surgeons adhering to current plastic surgical principles, and using “state of the art” surgical equipment and sutures, this is still a method that has some merit. In fact, its main disadvantage, in the viewpoint of some, is seen as a primary advantage in the opinion of others. Let me explain…

When performing the “trim” method, significant portions of the visible edges of a patient’s labia minora are surgically removed. This establishes new labial edges which, after complete healing, are pinker and smoother than the original, but which also must contain some scar tissue. For occasional patients, it is their natural labial edge appearance to which they mainly object. Their strongest wish is to be completely rid of the dark pigmentation within their labial edges, as well as elimination of the rugous appearance of their labia. Under this circumstance, only a “trim” method will offer the complete alteration in the “look” of their labia minora, that they are so vehemently requesting. This method of Labiaplasty is illustrated in the pre and post operative photographs of the following patient:

Labiaplasty, Before After Picture

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Labiaplasty, Vaginoplasty

(Left:Before, Right: After)

The second Labiaplasty technique is the “wedge” method, during which a “V” shaped portion of each labium is removed, and each labium is then carefully sutured back together, closing the “V”. This is done in such a manner that there’s scarcely a visible scar, and the labial edge retains a quite normal appearance, even after the labia minora protrusion has been dramatically corrected. In my experience, when patients are offered a choice between the two techniques, most prefer to undergo the “wedge” method and maintain their normal labial edge appearance. These photographs show a patient, illustrating the result to be expected from such a “wedge” Labiaplasty method:

Labiaplasty, Vaginoplasty Surgery

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Labiaplasty Results, Before After

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Regarding the ancillary Labiaplasty procedures, the most common is clitoral hood reduction. This is designed to decrease the amount of protrusion of the clitoral hood, by surgically removing a strip of skin from each side of the hood, near its attachment. So easily is this procedure accomplished that, most often, it is performed simultaneously with the Labiaplasty. This decision should be made with the patient in advance of her surgery.

The procedure known as hoodectomy is a surgical removal of the portion of clitoral hood directly covering the clitoris. This procedure is performed with the intent of exposing more of the clitoris and, in theory, it permits greater clitoral sensitivity. The true functional benefit of this procedure, however, would be extremely difficult to test, and its potential value remains controversial. Nevertheless, hoodectomy is an easily accomplished procedure that can be performed simultaneously with Labiaplasty, or done as a separate procedure.

The last ancillary procedure to be mentioned is that of clitoropexy. This operation is designed to move the clitoris to a deeper location, so it protrudes less. This is accomplished by suturing the clitoris closer to the underlying pelvic bone. A clitoropexy is, technically, a somewhat more challenging procedure which should only be performed by surgeons well versed in that technique.

Strictly speaking, a Vaginoplasty is an operation during which the vagina is tightened by the surgical removal of excess vaginal lining and the “shoring up” of underlying muscles that have been torn or stretched (usually during childbirth). Because this operation causes no “visible” alteration in the appearance of the external female genitalia, it is not considered to be a cosmetic surgical procedure. To the contrary, Vaginoplasty is performed for purely functional reasons and, hence, is not an operation typically performed by plastic surgeons, myself included.

Illustrative Labiaplasty drawings and a currently up to date discussion can also be found here:

http://www.labiaplasty.us.com

Cosmetic Surgery of the Labia Majora

Often overlooked in discussions about Labiaplasty, is the subject of surgery designed to improve or rejuvenate the appearance of the labia majora. As in the case of Labiaplasty (for the labia minora), such labia majora surgery has increased in popularity recently, presumably due to the impact of shaving or waxing the pubic area and genitalia, allowing the labial size and appearance to become much more evident. There are four prime conditions for which patients seem to seek this type of surgery.

The most frequent reason given by patients, as the source of their dissatisfaction with their labia majora, is the presence of a “deflated” and wrinkled labial skin surface. Though such is often a normal appearance, it tends to be interpreted as being the look of “older” women’s labia and, consequently, is very much unwanted. Surgical rejuvenation in this case requires some combination of skin tightening, with or without fat transfer into the labia (to “plump” them). The goal is always to achieve smooth skin, with or without a simultaneous increase in labia majora size, depending upon patient preferences. The skin tightening is accomplished by removing a strip of excess skin from the labia majora, such that the scar is hidden in the natural groove that exists between each labium majus and its adjacent labium minus. Following this skin tightening, if the labia still remain slightly wrinkled or appear undersized, injection of the patient’s own living fat (obtained by liposuction) is an effective way to augment labial volume and further smooth out the labial skin.

At other times, patients are troubled by their labia majora being too large. This creates the problem of a “bulge” existing in the crotch area, limiting their selection of suitable attire. As with lipodystrophy in other parts of the body, this can be effectively improved through liposuction (liposculpture).

In the case of patients who feel their labia majora appear simply too small, even though the skin may be smooth and unwrinkled, surgical intervention requires labial augmentation, again, preferably, by fat transfer.

Finally there is the occasional patient with labia majora asymmetry, one labium of a shape or size different from the other. Depending on which factor contributes to this asymmetry, one or more of the surgical techniques utilized in the previous conditions can be brought into play to help achieve better symmetry.

If you are a female reader, and this discussion of possibilities for cosmetic alteration of the labia majora happens to hit home, rest assured that these are all familiar and safe plastic surgical techniques. You no longer need to feel your condition has been overlooked (even though it is not well publicized) by the plastic surgical profession.

The Patient’s Experience

Unless it is performed for verifiable medical reasons, Labiaplasty is considered to be a form of cosmetic surgery. Classified as such, it’s usually not “covered” by health insurance companies. The cost of Labiaplasty can vary widely from one location to another, as well as from one surgeon to the next. Published prices seem to range from $2,000 to $10,000. It’s certainly smart for prospective patients to do some preliminary investigation and to “shop around” among a few highly regarded surgeons, if cost is going to be a factor.

Labiaplasty and the various ancillary procedures can all be performed on an outpatient basis, under twilight sleep (IV Sedation) or, if preferred, total sleep (General Anesthesia). The surgical time required for a Labiaplasty should generally range from 1 to 1 1/2 hours, if the operation is to be performed with meticulous attention, and patients should be wary of surgeons who claim to perform this procedure in significantly less time. Because of the outpatient nature of this surgery, as well as a relative paucity of proficient surgeons offering this procedure, it’s not uncommon for patients to decide to travel to a different city for their surgery. This may even entail a 2 – 3 day stay at their chosen location, particularly if they are traveling a significant distance, or traveling alone.

The recovery time (or down time from work or school) can vary from a couple days, with a well performed “wedge” Labiaplasty, to a week or more if the surgery is more extensive or if it hasn’t been meticulously done. Full healing, as with any surgery, requires 6 – 12 months.

When this surgery is properly performed, the complication rate should be very low. Post operative bleeding is common but usually minimal, and infection (by bacteria or yeast) should be infrequent, in spite of the inherently non-sterile nature of this area of the body. Significant loss of labial sensation should not be encountered. All sutures are dissolvable, and, on occasion, some may dissolve or become dislodged prematurely. This rarely presents a problem if a sufficient number of stitches were utilized. Sexual intercourse may be safely resumed after 6 weeks, without fear of disrupting the healing process.

It’s been my experience that most patients are exceedingly happy with their decision to go ahead with their labiaplasty and are elated by the inevitable boost to their self-esteem, which so many seem to experience. The satisfaction rate is extremely high, and the incidence of surgical revision is quite low.

Buyer Beware

For all types of surgery, there are good surgeons as well as some “not so good” surgeons. Labiaplasty surgery is no exception. There is an overlap of surgical specialties involved in the treatment of these patients, primarily involving Plastic Surgery and Gynecology. Prospective patients are strongly advised to seek out a Board Certified surgeon in one of those respective specialties. It is also important for prospective patients to be aware that not all plastic surgeons or all gynecologists regularly perform Labiaplasties, and some preliminary research in an effort to find a proficient surgeon, with appropriate experience as well as suitable credentials is important. Sub-specialization in the field of cosmetic genital surgery is also a favorable sign. This can often be detected in the literature or website information provided by the surgeon. Certainly, patients shouldn’t make the same mistake others have made, in requesting that a Labiaplasty be done, for the sake of convenience, while undergoing other surgery, without first being aware of their surgeon’s Labiaplasty expertise!

Conclusion

It’s now plainly evident that Labiaplasty is rapidly “coming of age”, chiefly driven by request of the female public. When performed under ideal circumstances and by proficient surgeons, this should be a safe and gratifying plastic surgical procedure. With the benefit of some advance knowledge and a thoughtful investigation, a good qualified surgeon should certainly be found. Years of humiliation can then be permanently put to rest, as the patient’s self-esteem is successfully restored.

About The Author

Dr. Charles Gruenwald, Makeheheal.comCharles Gruenwald, MD, FACS, is certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and has more than 30 years’ experience helping patients from the Louisiana market. His talent and experience are widely recognized, making him a highly sought after aesthetic surgeon. In addition to founding and maintaining an highly regarded practice in Baton Rouge, he served until recently as an Assistant Professor in Plastic Surgery at Louisiana State University, Department of Surgery. Attesting to his wide range of surgical experience, Dr. Gruenwald is also certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology.

Dr. Gruenwald is a 1969 graduate of Duke University School of Medicine. He completed a surgery internship and year of general surgery residency in New York City, at State University of New York, Kings County Hospital. Following this was completion of a three-year residency in otolaryngology at Harvard University Medical School, in Boston. He finished formal medical training in 1978, completing a two-year plastic surgery residency with the University of Utah College of Medicine, in Salt Lake City.

Dr. Gruenwald began his plastic surgery practice in 1978, when he helped establish “Associates in Plastic Surgery” in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. He has been one of the principal plastic surgeons for that group, ever since. For 25 years, of that time, he also was affiliated with LSU, as an associate professor in plastic surgery for the Division of Surgery, LSU School of Medicine.

Click here for more information on Dr. Charles Gruenwald.

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Plastic Surgery: The Holiday Gift That Keeps On Giving

Posted on November 13th, 2008 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Sherrell Aston, M.D., F.A.C.S.

Rachel A. Miller, PA-C

The holiday season is quickly approaching, and we are all eager to celebrate with family, friends, and colleagues. But some of us are, at the same time, wishing we could have a little more time to get “holiday ready.” That is, we know that our holiday décor is not the most important thing on display this year—we are! If you are a member of the some of us crowd, then read on:

You have decided that this year is your year, and you are going to look and feel your best! Plastic surgeons have a few special tricks to get you there, but time is of the essence. Since time is our limiting factor, let’s begin there:

Sherrell Aston, Plastic Surgery

Your schedule is tight, and so is your plastic surgeon’s. If you plan to spruce up before the holidays, you are running short on time. But, don’t despair; modern techniques offer less invasive procedures and faster recoveries. For example, you could have a facelift and be “party ready” in just 2-3 weeks. If you are even shorter on time to spare before the holiday season, Botox injections can leave you looking more refreshed in just days. Of course, you should not forget that plastic surgery is really surgery, and the recovery time depends upon your chosen procedure. Certainly there is variability among patients in bruising, swelling, and final healing, but it is possible to make some generalizations for the most common procedures.

Modern facelift techniques can provide dramatic improvements to your face and neck and require a recovery time of just ten days to two weeks before you could attend a social function. In just twenty-one days you could be back in the gym, engaged in full activities. Short-incision facelifts look very good in seven to ten days for many patients. Today’s facelift procedures are technically sophisticated and highly individualized for the particular patient. No two people are just alike, and accordingly, nor are any two facelifts. Repositioning of the underlying facial foundation (muscles, muscle coverings, and fat) rather than just pulling the skin tightly across the face is the key to a refreshed and youthful, but not “operated-on” appearance.

Unless they desire a look very different from their original face, most men and women in their 40’s and 50’s do not need volume addition or replacement. Some individuals do lose facial fat volume as they age, and they may benefit from fat grafts (fat taken from one area of your body and injected into your face) or filler substances very judiciously placed. Injectable filler solutions fall into two main categories: (1) man-made or natural hyaluronic acid substances (Restylane, Perlane, Juvederm, Sculptra) and (2) fat. Recovery from injectable fillers is extremely variable and dependent upon the amount of substance injected and individual healing. Very limited amounts of injectables can offer short recovery times—days to weeks; but do not be fooled, extensive additions of injectable solutions can cause significant swelling and bruising, and therefore, they require extended recovery times—three to six weeks. Most importantly, you should seek out an experienced plastic surgeon and openly discuss your cosmetic desires. Injectable solutions, if used too liberally, can significantly alter your facial shape, which is not usually a patient’s goal.

The fine lines surrounding your eyes and upper lip will not be best improved with injectable solutions. Do not lose hope, because plastic surgeons have tools for these pesky grooves. Advances in laser technology allow plastic surgeons to target the fine lines in the surface of the skin to reveal refreshed, smoother, younger-looking skin. Do not be fooled—Any skin resurfacing procedure that provides a significant result will require some down time. You should expect significant redness that will regress over four to six weeks, but this redness can be easily concealed with makeup within about seven days. Laser resurfacing of the skin around your eyes or lips is a procedure to consider if you desire a smoother skin surface and you have at least one week of flexibility before your event. You will be so pleased with how smoothly your makeup will glide across your newly-smoothed skin.

Speaking of makeup, have you realized that you are wearing eyeshadow that no one else can see? This may be because your eyelid skin is getting droopy with age, or it may be due to an increasing heaviness and drop in your brow position. Regardless of the cause, the problem can be fully remedied in time for your holiday festivities, if you have around two weeks to go. Modern browlift techniques avoid the old-fashioned scar across your hairline and can lift the brow into a more youthful position with just a couple of very small incisions that are fully hidden in your hair. A blepharoplasty “eyelift” procedure can not only provide a smooth surface for your eye makeup, but it also removes excess skin and bulges from your eyes to give a refreshed, awake, younger appearance. As with any surgery, individual healing times will vary. In most cases, significant regression of bruising and swelling occurs within ten days, and you can begin wearing makeup even sooner. In fact, a skilled makeup artist could conceal any bruises resulting from a browlift within one day of surgery.

Perhaps you have been too busy with holiday planning this year and you do not have even one week to spare! Do not despair; with just a few days to go before your big event, there is still time for Botox. Skillfully placed Botox injections can leave you looking refreshed and rested with zero downtime. Just spend ten minutes with your plastic surgeon and then you can hit the mall again or continue your holiday preparations. Of all cosmetic procedures, Botox is one of the least-invasive options, and with skilled delivery, you will not look “over done.” Botox decreases the contraction of facial muscles, which subsequently decreases the amount of skin that can wrinkle up in certain regions of the face. Particularly good areas to target are the forehead, the crowsfeet, and the area between the brows. Perhaps you were considering a browlift but you worry about having enough time to recover before your upcoming events. Botox offers a temporary solution that can lift the outer edges of the brow just a bit. For most people, Botox begins to take effect within a couple of days, but its full action is not realized until around day ten. Though Botox is popular and widely available, it is not risk-free. You should still seek out an experienced physician who can skillfully inject the Botox without causing distortions in your facial expression.

If you are wondering about what the possibilities are for the rest of your body, you are in luck! The options for targeting troublesome body zones are much more flexible, as your healing parts will be concealed under your party clothes. For instance, breast augmentations and moderate liposuction procedures do not significantly impose upon your holiday schedule. Take a day or two off from shopping and holiday prepping just after surgery, and then, if you feel like it, you can put on your finest frock and head out the door (but please refrain from vigorous activity or exercise). Just don’t forget to communicate with your surgeon, follow his instructions, and return to the office for your post-operative appointments. Larger volume liposuction procedures, breast reductions, breast lifts, and abdominoplasties (”tummy tucks”) require a bit more recovery time, and so should be considered if you have at least two weeks of flexibility.

If you have decided that this is your year to outshine your Christmas tree or Menorah, then it’s time to get started! You are the most important person on your gift list, and if you are like most of us, you really hadn’t thought about that. Give yourself a gift this year that will keep on giving and spread some holiday cheer!

About the Author

Dr. Sherrell Aston, Plastic SurgeonDr. Sherrell Aston is the Surgeon Director and Chairman of the Department of Plastic Surgery at Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital (MEETH) in New York; more cosmetic surgery procedures are performed each year at MEETH than any other institution in the World. He also serves as a Professor of Plastic Surgery at the New York University School of Medicine and Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery.

His major research interests are facial anatomy in aesthetic surgery and techniques for improving surgical results. Dr. Aston is renowned for his development of the FAME (finger-assisted malar elevation) technique for facelifts, which repositions not only the skin, but also the soft tissue of the face to give a youthful but non operated appearance.

Dr. Aston received his Medical Degree from the University of Virginia, in Charlottesville, Virginia. His post-doctoral training included a surgical internship and residency at the University California, Los Angles (UCLA) Medical Center. Prior to being Chief Resident at UCLA, he was a Halsted Fellow in Surgery at John Hopkins Hospital. Dr. Aston continued his training as a Plastic Surgery Resident and Chief Resident at the Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center. Dr. Aston is certified by the American Board of Surgery and the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Learn more about Dr. Sherrell Aston.

See Before & After Plastic Surgery Photos

Chat on Plastic Surgery Message Boards

Shop for Plastic Surgery & Beauty Products

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

The Past, Present & Future of Breast Implants

Posted on October 24th, 2008 in Breast Augmentation, Implants, Reduction, Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Dr. Jennifer Walden, MD, FACS

The History. The enhancement of the female breast has been a source of attention for centuries. In 1889, one of the first recorded breast augmentation procedures was performed by the Austrian surgeon Gersuny, who injected liquid paraffin directly into the breasts to enhance their shape and fullness. Since then numerous attempts including the placement of foam, sponge, and liquid silicone have been performed to surgically enlarge the breasts, often with devastating results.

In 1962, Houston plastic surgeons Cronin and Gerow began the clinical trials which led to the first silicone gel-filled implants by the manufacturer Dow Corning in 1963. Although various modifications have and continue to be made on the original prototype design, it was the silicone breast implant that was greatly responsible for reducing the serious problems associated with earlier injection techniques. In an ironic twist, public concerns regarding a possible link between silicone implants and autoimmune disease, as well as other health issues sparked a media frenzy which resulted in a moratorium on silicone gel-filled implants by the FDA in 1992. This ban left saline implants as the only option in the U.S. for surgical augmentation until 1998, when silicone was reintroduced in restricted clinical trials. By 2006, however, there had been no conclusive scientific data to support a correlation between silicone breast implants and any systemic disease. Silicone gel implants once again have become available for primary augmentation procedures and remain the prosthesis of choice worldwide with a well-established safety profile.

What Now? Problems with the earlier generation silicone gel implants were that they had a thick, unnaturally stiff shell, a high rate of gel bleed, and an unacceptably high incidence of capsular contracture (up to 70%). Third generation implants, from the mid-1980s forward until today, utilize a multi-layer barrier shell to decrease gel bleed and are filled with a thicker, more cohesive gel to reduce potential leakage. These implants, termed “responsive gels,” have proven high rates of safety and efficacy, and were re-approved for general use with conditions by the United States FDA in November 2006. Currently, third generation silicone gel-filled breast implants are approved for: (1) reconstruction in women of any age and (2) augmentation in women 22 years or older. In contrast, saline-filled breast implants are approved for women 18 years or older. The two main implant manufacturers which provide plastic surgeons and patients with well-studied, safe FDA-approved breast implants for their patients in the United States are Mentor (Santa Barbara, CA) and Allergan Corporation (Irvine, CA).

As a female plastic surgeon, breast augmentation is my most requested and performed procedure. In New York, my average patient is in her 20s or 30s, wants to do it for herself to improve the appearance of her breasts, may have one or two children, and has arrived at the decision to have it done independently and privately after conducting her own research. Besides me doing this procedure multiple times every week, breast augmentation has also been the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure for women in the United States the past two years! I am using silicone implants about 85% of the time and saline implants about 15% of the time. I find that silicone implants more closely resemble the consistency and texture of normal breast tissue, and that the tactile and visual aesthetics are more pleasing. That being said, saline implants are still a nice option in women under 22 years of age for primary breast augmentation or when dealing with an asymmetry where it will be helpful to fill the implants different volumes intraoperatively. One of the benefits of saline filled implants is that they can be adjusted in the operating room, as opposed to pre-filled silicone implants which often require the use of sizers intraoperatively for cases of different sized breasts.

In the following preop and postop example, the patient is 5′4″ and 115 pounds. I used 300cc smooth round moderate plus profile under the muscle saline filled implants.

Breast Augmentation, Before, After

(Left: Before, Right: After)

The breast pocket may be created in either the subglandular (under the gland) or subpectoral (under the pectoralis major muscle) space. The subglandular technique is usually reserved for patients who have substantial breast tissue or a mild degree of ptosis, or breast droop, since greater projection may be obtained. Also, women who are avid bodybuilders may prefer subglandular implants for the reason that placing them under the muscle in some instances may produce breast animation and distortions when the pectoral muscles are flexed. Increased risks of capsular contracture, rippling and implant palpability are typically issues discouraging the routine use of subglandular placement.

In the vast majority of patients, I believe the under the muscle technique produces optimum results. The pectoralis major drapes the top 3/4 of the implant, softening the transition, and therefore creating a more anatomically shaped breast mound. This method also achieves a natural feel, which is especially desirable when using saline implants. In addition to improved aesthetic outcomes, there are advantages in regard to breast-feeding as well as cancer screening.

The proper selection if breast implant size is extremely important for minimizing complications and optimizing patient satisfaction. I consider the base diameter of the chest, along with tissue laxity and the amount of breast tissue a patient is starting with, as the most important factors in choosing implant size. Implants come in three types of profiles: moderate, moderate plus or midrange depending upon the implant manufacturer, or high profile. For a given width, or base diameter, of an implant the implant project lower or higher on the chest. So, for a base diameter of 12 centimeters (a measurement the surgeon takes across the width of your breast), a moderate profile implant will have less volume and projection than a moderate plus or high profile implant does for the same base diameter. I generally use moderate plus or midrange profile implants because the average base diameter I see is around 11.5 to 12.5 cm. This gives around 300 to 325 cc of volume (a very common size of implant—around a C cup if you were starting as an A cup, or with little breast tissue).

I tend to reserve moderate profile implants for women with very broad chests who don’t particularly want to look top-heavy, and I use high profile implants in women who are petite with a smaller base diameters (say 10.5 cm) who say they want to be a C cup or bigger…. I need the increased volume built into the higher projection of the implant to get them to the volume they want without the implant borders extending outside of the natural confines of their breasts. Ultra high profile implants are available and more popular in Europe and other countries due to the increased demand for greater projection and size. Implants that are too big for a woman’s individual chest dimensions lead to a higher likelihood of irreparable tissue stretch, bottoming out, and complications that may lead to reoperation.

In the following preop and postop example, the patient is 5′4″ and 115 pounds. I used 350cc smooth round high profile under the muscle silicone gel implants.

Breast Augmentation, Before and After

(Left: Before, Right: After)

What’s New? Evaluation of the highly-cohesive, form-stable fourth generation implants is well underway by the FDA in the United States, but these implants have been widely used since the mid-1990s in many other countries and are very popular in Europe. These teardrop-shaped (often called anatomic or “gummy bear”) implants are textured and contain a highly cross-linked form of silicone gel to minimize the possibility of silicone migration, as well as upper pole collapse and folds in the implant shell. Studies of these devices have shown significant promise in clinical trials with low rates of capsular contracture and rupture, and high rates of patient satisfaction. Both Mentor and Allergan Corporation have shaped anatomic gel implants that are being reviewed by the FDA but are available in Europe and other countries around the world. There are a matrix of different implants to chose from in these lines, with varying width, height, and projection for different body and breast types.

Allergan’s highly cohesive, shaped implant is called the Style 410, and the company is currently in discussions with the FDA and look forward to a decision regarding its approval, but cannot speculate on timing. A very similar situation exists with Mentor Corporation as well for their form stable shaped implant called Contour Profile Gel (CPG). The shaped cohesive gel implant represents a new option in the United States for women considering breast surgery for reconstruction and augmentation. In my opinion, the potential drawbacks are that they do feel a little firmer than the smooth round responsive gels, and the possibility exists that they could shift or turn in the pocket and not look or feel right if that were to happen (called malrotation). For this reason, very precise breast pocket dissection is needed for this type of implant. These implants do cost significantly more than saline, and likely will cost several hundred dollars more per pair than responsive silicone gel implants if and when they are approved by the FDA.

Since highly cohesive gel implants are not deformable, they cannot be squeezed through little incisions. Depending upon the size of the implant, incision length must be between 4.5-5.5 cm. It also can make insertion from around the areola difficult. Armpit, or transaxillary incision is possible, but exceedingly difficult. The reason at this point in time that I actually prefer smooth round gels is that they act and feel very much like normal breast tissue — when you lay down, normal breast tissue flattens and lateralizes, and so do the smooth round responsive gels. When you stand up, gravity takes effect and the gel situates within the implant at the base of the breast to give fullness in the lower pole and a smooth slope at the top. This can be illustrated in Figure 1a (Style 410) and Figure 1b (Smooth round responsive gel) with my nurse, Sarah, and the two types of implants in the photos. I also am able to fit smooth round silicone gel implants through relatively small incisions at the inframammery crease, areolar border (periareolar), or armpit.

Breast Implants

(Left: Figure 1a, Right: Figure 1b)

In summary, pending FDA approval Mentor’s Contour Profile Gel and Allergan’s Style 410 will be the latest additions to the already wide selection of available implants; there are hundreds of breast implant combinations from type of filler, volume, base width and profile—all to help women and their surgeon find the fit that is appropriate for them.

The Future. Breast enhancement using fat grafts (lipoaugmentation) rather than silicone or saline implants employs fat suctioned from the patient’s buttocks, thighs or other fatty areas. This type of breast surgery can be used to increase the size of the breast or to fill in defects or abnormalities in existing breasts, including enhancing the appearance after breast reconstruction and softening the look of existing implants. Fat injections of the breasts may offer patients augmentation with a natural look and feel and the benefit of body contouring through liposuction—without the requirement for incisions or implants.

However, long-term safety and efficacy data as well as the effect of the procedure on breast cancer screening using mammography is still being evaluated in clinical studies. Concerns about fat grafting for breast enhancement include unpredictable or low survival rates of the transferred cells (which are frequently absorbed by the body), development of cysts, calcification and tissue scarring. Another major concern is long-term problems with breast cancer detection due to difficulties in telling the difference on mammograms between calcifications associated with breast cancer and calcifications associated with fat transfer.

This procedure does offer a modest opportunity for enhancement— specifically, about one cup size increase and the degree of enlargement will depend on the amount of spare fat that the patient has. But, numerous questions remain about this new technique: How much of the fat survives? Does the procedure have to be repeated? Are the breasts hard and uncomfortable for long periods after the procedure? And most importantly, what are the cancer implications of this technique? Research projects, funded by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation (ASERF) of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery are being conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of breast enhancement with fat.

In the meantime, plastic surgeons will continue to study the intricate details of the procedure for the safety of our patients– namely, the techniques of harvesting, preparation, and placement of the fat tissue, who should receive fat transfer, when it is appropriate, and whether it is safe for the long term. Results of clinical studies this far seem promising—so maybe going up a cup size with the benefit of a little liposuction elsewhere will be common practice in 5 or 10 years! Anyone reading this should be aware that this procedure is very technique dependant and to avoid complications it must to be done correctly by a properly trained, board-certified plastic surgeon.

Let the Buyer Beware. Have you heard of dermal fillers? These materials are gel-like compounds that can be injected into the body and have been traditionally used in facial rejuvenation. They increase the volume of the area injected, and are either classified as permanent or semi-permanent. Restylane, Hylaform, and Juvederm are types of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers that are currently FDA approved for injection into the nasolabial folds, or laugh lines, of the face.

Swedish scientists have developed a dermal filler called Macrolane (made by Q-Med in Sweden) which is being marketed in Europe and is not approved by the FDA for use in the United States. Macrolane is composed of hyaluronic acid but in larger particles than those found in Restylane. This makes it more suitable for treatment of larger areas, and the body may absorb it more slowly given the larger particle size. Known on the internet and in the media as a “Boob Jab,” Macrolane is being touted for breast augmentation and shaping of the décolletage, as well as an adjunct after breast implant procedures and liposuction when there may be contour problems. Compared with treatment with Restylane, much greater volumes are used in an average treatment with Macrolane and the gel is injected deeper in the skin layer to add larger volumes.

But be aware that this procedure is not permanent - all dermal fillers are eventually absorbed and metabolized by the body! One round of Macrolane breast augmentation may last 1-2 years, but could resorb in less time than that. Controversy exists around this procedure as we don’t know exactly how this material will look on mammogram, if it will eventually cause permanent lumps and bumps, or if it could even obscure of confuse the diagnosis of a future breast cancer.

My associate recently met a woman from London who consulted with him about getting silicone breast implants. The patient reported that she had undergone breast injections with Macrolane for enhancement. The procedure was done by injecting the material through a cannula, or hollow tube, with incisions of 6-7mm on either sides of her breasts. The patient stated that the material was injected under the pectoralis major muscle and was indeed painful even though some local anesthesia was used. She went from a full A cup to a B cup…but all of the material was gone in 2 ½ to 3 months, and then she was right back down to an A-cup! Hence the consultation for real breast implants.

Other drawbacks of the “Boob Jab” procedure include that Macrolane is only available in the UK and Europe, costs an average $4,000 - $7,000 (similar to the cost of breast implants, which is a much longer lasting form of enhancement!), and we don’t know its long term effects on breast tissue and the overlying skin. Yes, this means the procedure and payment needs to be repeated every 1-2 years if you decide to enter into such a treatment plan; I would argue to save your money and think about augmentation with FDA approved breast implants if you are this serious about going forward with augmenting your breasts.

Can breast pumps be used for breast enlargement and how do they work? Breast pumps basically work through the physiological process known as tissue expansion. If you apply a gentle pressure to stretch skin or other soft tissues, they slowly stretch. If you’ve ever seen a person with oversized ear plugs or a native tribesman with a large ornament in his lip, you’ve seen tissue expansion at work. By applying relatively gentle vacuum (negative) pressure to the breasts, breast pumps encourage the process of tissue expansion. Over time this leads to a modest increase in breast size, but temporary breast pumps in my opinion are really not a viable permanent breast enlargement solution. In fact, overuse of this type of breast pump may cause broken blood vessels, skin irritation, and discomfort. The Brava system (Brava, LLC, Coconut Grove, FL) is one of the more popular branded devices for external breast enlargement by this method that has been studied in a well-controlled fashion. The Brava system has been shown to increase breast size after prolonged use, but there are some significant drawbacks including the following:

  • Cost - the Brava device runs about $2500
  • Time - the device must be worn 10 hours a day for 10 weeks, or 700 hours
  • Discomfort - the device applies a rather strong suction to the chest, which many women find uncomfortable
  • Amount of growth - on average, after 10 weeks, a woman may gain about 100 cc of breast volume, and that’s only about ½ of a cup size.
  • Embarrassment - you don’t want to be seen outside the house in this contraption, and most women that I know (including myself) would not be game for wearing this apparatus on their breasts for 10 hours a day… it’s simply not feasible.

Cleavage enhancers like Rodial Boob Job (Rodial, UK) are creams that tout enlargement of the breasts as an end effect. Although these creams may tighten, soften and enhance the appearance of the skin of the breasts, there is no way that a topically applied cream can block internal fat deposition elsewhere in the body and focus it to the breasts, which is what the company’s website claims.

Mama Mio Boob Tube (Mama Mio, Huntington Beach, CA) is a nice product that has active ingredients including CoQ10 which is important for skin strength and elasticity, Shea Butter and Dandelion Root for restoring skin tone, Evening Primrose Oil, Avocado oil, and a rich blend of omega 3, 6, and 9. I have used this product before and has a very rich moisturizing quality, lovely scent…and the company sells a complement of products for the tummy, buttocks, breasts, etc, including “Bootcamp for Butts” and “Bootcamp for Boobs” creams! (LOL).

In summary, breast augmentation technology is changing fast, and but I seriously doubt implants themselves will ever become a thing of the past! Newer techniques involving the injection of substances into the breasts should be considered judiciously after doing proper research and consulting with a qualified plastic surgeon.

About Dr. Walden

Dr. Jennifer WaldenJennifer L. Walden, MD, FACS is a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon who is fellowship-trained in aesthetic surgery and board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. She currently is an associate attending in Plastic Surgery at Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital and Lenox Hill Hospital. She is also a member of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and is a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons. Her office is located at in Manhattan at 50 East 71st Street (on the corner of Park Avenue and 71st Street).

Dr. Walden, a native Texan, received her undergraduate education at the University of Texas at Austin, graduating with Honors with a Bachelor of Arts in Biology. She continued her education at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston where she received her Medical Doctorate with Highest Honors and numerous academic awards including graduating as the salutatorian of her medical school class. Dr. Walden received her formal training in plastic and reconstructive surgery at the University of Texas Medical Branch and completed an externship at the prestigious Plastic Surgery Associates in Miami under the direction of Dr’s. Baker and Stuzin. After completing her residency training, she moved from Texas to New York to pursue her special interest in aesthetic surgery during her fellowship at Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital under the direction of Sherrell J. Aston, MD. During her fellowship, she benefited from the knowledge and expertise of many internationally known leaders in the field of aesthetic plastic surgery. Dr. Walden is currently the Program Director of the Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital Aesthetic Surgery Fellowship, one of the foremost organized training programs of cosmetic surgery in the nation.

Dr. Walden has presented multiple research papers, published articles, and has enjoyed involvement in organized medicine and plastic surgery on both local and national levels. Learn More About Dr. Walden

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Plastic Surgery After Massive Weight Loss

By Andrew Wolfe, MD

Obesity and the constellation of diseases which result from obesity are among the most significant health problems in the United States today. In an effort to combat this epidemic, patients are increasingly turning to Bariatric Surgeons for massive weight loss surgery. Last year 200,000 Bariatric procedures were performed, representing a 10-fold increase over the previous decade. The benefits of the weight loss are profound and far-reaching. Physiologically, there are improvements in many weight-related conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and skeletal disorders. The psychological benefits include marked improvements in body image and social acceptance as well as decreases in depression and anxiety.

Although the weight loss is truly a life saving process, it is not without its negative side effects. Psychological challenges can include stressful changes in relationships with the patient’s spouse, friends, and the opposite sex. These changes can be so pronounced that patients may experience an identity crisis after weight loss, and psychological counseling and support groups are integral to the successful transition from obese to non-obese. Physically, the loss of fat results in disproportionately loose skin and underlying soft tissue, which can lead to both aesthetic and functional concerns.

For many massive weight loss (MWL) patients, Plastic Surgery is a vital step in their journey, and improves their physical and psychological well-being. More than 100,000 contouring procedures have been performed on MWL patients, and that number is growing exponentially. The goals of surgery are straightforward – improved function, hygiene and appearance, achieved through safe, predictable procedures. As straightforward as these goals may be, post-MWL Plastic Surgery is a rapidly-evolving specialty, and procedures are constantly evolving to offer patients better, safer results.

Prior to any elective surgery after MWL, preoperative considerations which must be taken into account include nutrition, weight stability, and smoking habits. Nutritional deficiencies are common after weight reduction surgery, although newer Bariatric procedures are less likely to affect patients adversely than were older techniques. Vitamin and protein levels are generally checked before surgery, and supplemented if necessary, in an effort to maximize the efficiency of wound healing. Weight stability prior to contouring procedures is beneficial, and most patients undergo Plastic Surgery 12 to 18 months after their Bariatric procedure. A minimum of 3 months at a stable weight is a typical benchmark, although 6 months of stability is preferred. Of note, some patients do find that contouring procedures lead to further weight reduction through increased activity levels postoperatively. All nicotine-containing products must be avoided around the time of surgery, as they significantly increase the risk of wound healing complications.

The types of procedures performed on MWL patients are different than those on non-weight-loss patients. Given the profound laxity that most patients exhibit, extensive excisional procedures are usually necessary, resulting in larger scars, longer recovery times, and greater risks. In addition to the increased amount of skin, the quality of the skin that remains after contouring procedures tends to be of poor quality – stretch marks, loss of elasticity, and atrophy of the skin are all to be expected. Because of this, secondary touch-ups and revisions are not unusual in this population, and should not be seen as failures of the original surgery. Fortunately, MWL patients tend to be very tolerant of scars, very motivated, and extremely satisfied with the dramatic improvements that these procedures can produce.

Procedure types are generally broken up into the lower body (abdomen, buttocks, and thighs), and the upper body (breast, back, and arms). MWL patients present with a wide variety of deformities, priorities, and expectations, and individualization of treatment is crucial to success. Many patients require more surgery than can safely be performed in one session, and a staged approach is usually necessary. The lower body is generally addressed first, as the abdomen is almost universally a priority for MWL patients. Second stage procedures address the upper body, while a third stage may be useful for thigh tightening and/or touch-ups. Facial procedures may also be performed.

Laxity of the skin and soft tissues of the abdomen can be pronounced after MWL, and virtually all patients require some type of abdominal tightening. An abdominoplasty, or “tummy tuck” corrects this laxity with a multi-layered approach that tightens skin and muscle while removing excess fat in the lower abdomen.

Abdominoplasty, Plastic Surgery

This diagrams illustrates the key steps of an abdominoplasty. The initial incisions are made around the umbilicus and in the lower abdomen, and the skin is lifted off of the underlying muscles up to the rib cage. The rectus muscles are then tightened. As shown, this tightening is generally done in a vertical fashion, although additional vectors of tightening may be added if significant laxity exists. The patient is flexed on the table, and excess skin is advanced down towards the pubis and excised. Finally, the umbilicus is brought up through the abdominoplasty flap and sculpted into position.

Dr. Wolfe, Abdominoplasty

Photos of a 35-year-old woman who had lost 90 lbs, before and after an abdominoplasty.

Abdominoplasty, Dr. Andrew Wolfe

Photos of a 44-year-old woman who lost 120 lbs after an open gastric bypass before and after an abdominoplasty. (She previously underwent an augmentation/mastopexy.)

Dr Wolfe, Gastric Bypass

Photos of 38-year-old woman who lost 180 lbs after a laparoscopic gastric bypass, before and after lower body lift with augmentation/mastopexy.

Surgical correction of the upper body includes the female breast, male chest, arms, and back. Female breast surgery is commonly performed after MWL with the goals of improving the breast shape, volume, and skin envelope. Given the loss of soft tissue integrity of the breast that comes with MWL, most patients will need some type of skin tightening, be it with a mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, or reduction. In some patients, this can be achieved with a vertical scar pattern, while others with more profound ptosis may need a Wise-pattern or “anchor” scar.

The preoperative breast volume may be ideal, in which case a mastopexy alone can be performed. In this operation, the breast gland is reshaped, and excess skin is removed. Although no volume is removed, the breast tends to appear smaller due to its more compact shape. Many patients present with breasts that remain too large even after weight loss, and a breast reduction is performed. Finally, patients may desire a breast that is larger and perkier than their current breast. A breast augmentation in conjunction with a mastopexy is then performed.

Mastopexy, Dr. Wolfe

Photo of a 45-year-old patient before and after an augmentation/vertical mastopexy.

Arm laxity is an issue for many patients after MWL, and is corrected with an arm lift, or brachioplasty. A brachioplasty tightens loose arm skin, improves the contour of the axilla, and can be combined with liposuction of the arm if residual fullness exists. The degree of laxity often seen after MWL often requires a full brachioplasty as opposed to a more limited technique, and results in scars which extend to the inner elbow. These scars often heal very well but take years to fully mature, and are visible in a short-sleeved shirt.

MWL patients often experience premature aging of the facial soft issues in addition to those changes seen in other parts of the body. Loss of volume and elasticity in the face can be corrected with procedures that resuspend soft tissues and tighten the skin while maintaining or augmenting facial volume. Newer facelift techniques may afford patients shorter scars, a quicker recovery, and fewer complications. A popular technique is the “Short-scar Lateral SMAS-ectomy” facelift, developed by Dr. Daniel Baker. Also known as a “Mini-facelift”, this procedure offers significant improvement in facial shape with a surgery less aggressive than that commonly performed. Many patients choose to add other procedures such as eyelid surgery (”blepharoplasty”) or brow lift at the same time for a more complete facial rejuvenation.

The risks associated with these procedures vary widely. For many body contouring procedures, the scars are long and heal to varying degrees of fineness. Wound healing complications are more likely in smokers and those with poor nutrition. Secondary relaxation of tissues is certainly possible, even after an aggressive procedure, and revisions are common in this patient population. As previously stated, a revision should be seen as a fine-tuning or enhancement of a previous operation. Deep venous thrombosis, or DVT, is one of the most dreaded complications seen with this type of surgery. During surgery, or in the postoperative period, these clots can form in the deep veins of the legs and have the potential to migrate to the lungs as a pulmonary embolism, a potentially fatal complication. A key intraoperative step to prevent DVT’s is the use of pneumatic compression devices that are applied to the legs. Early ambulation after surgery is also important. The risk of DVT is increased in the obese, older patients, smokers, and patients taking birth control pills. If multiple risk factors are present, short-term treatment with an injectable anticoagulant such as Fragmin or Lovenox may be used.

The postoperative recovery after surgery can range from less than a week for some breast procedures to three weeks for a lower body lift. Most breast procedures require a week off from work, and result in postoperative discomfort that requires prescription pain medication for three or four days. Lighter exercise may be resumed in two weeks, while more vigorous activities such as yoga or Pilates should be avoided for three or four weeks. In contrast, abdominoplasties and body lifts often require two tow three weeks off of work, with lighter exercise resuming at three weeks. Strenuous activities should be avoided for six weeks to allow adequate healing of the lifted tissues. Facial procedures tend to result in relatively mild discomfort, but patient appearance may dictate a two-week avoidance of social activities.

In summary, the field of Plastic Surgery after MWL is rapidly advancing. For these patients, safety is first and foremost, and a systematic approach to presurgical, intraoperative, and postoperative care can reduce complications. Communication, patient education, and informed consent are crucial, and patients must have realistic expectations. Finally, individualization and timing of procedures should be based on patient anatomy and patient priorities. Despite the challenges MWL patients present, the rewards for both surgeon and patient can be great.

About the Author

Dr. Andrew Wolfe, Plastic SurgeonBorn and raised in New York, Dr. Andrew Wolfe operates his practice, “The Center for Cosmetic Surgery,” in Denver, Colorado. Dr. Wolfe is passionate about his work, and thoroughly enjoys both the personal and technical aspects of the specialty. He believes that the physician-patient relationship is truly a partnership. “I have to understand a patient’s history, desires, and physical status before I can recommend a course of action. At the same time,” Dr. Wolfe says, “the patient has to learn about the various options available for any given procedure before they can make an informed decision.” Patient education is a high priority at the Center for Cosmetic Surgery, and Dr. Wolfe spends a great deal of time with his patients, both before and after surgery, making sure that they understand their surgical options. At the Center for Cosmetic Surgery, Dr. Wolfe has created a blend of state-of-the-art techniques and more traditional approaches. “I’m not shy about adopting new techniques or procedures”, he says, “but I need to be sure that they are safe and effective first.” Above all, Dr. Wolfe feels privileged to be able to be able to perform the work he does. “Virtually everything I do is elective, and I consider it an honor to be chosen by a patient to perform their surgery.” Learn more about Dr. Wolfe.

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Anatomy of A Plastic Surgery Mommy Makeover

Posted on September 23rd, 2008 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Karen M. Horton, MD, MSc, FRCSC

What is the “Mommy Makeover”?

Mothers devote so much of themselves and their resources to their children, from time and energy to money and miles on the car. Moms feel good about this, knowing that every sacrifice is more than worthwhile to keep their family healthy and happy. But sometimes, in all mothers do, their own well-being gets a little forgotten. What if you could take great care of yourself and raise your children too? That’s exactly the philosophy behind “Mommy Makeover” cosmetic surgery. More than ever, exciting surgical options are available to reverse the unwanted effects of childbearing and age.

A Mommy Makeover is a cosmetic surgery procedure(s) aimed at making a mother look the way she did before she had children, or perhaps even better than before! Many of today’s moms don’t feel they should sacrifice the way they look just because they’ve had children. Women usually desire to have their abdominal contour and tone and breasts back the way they were prior to pregnancy. The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) reports that demand for those three procedures rose by 11 percent for women ages 20 to 39 between 2005 and 2006.

Aimed at mothers, the Mommy Makeover usually involves a breast lift with or without breast implants, in addition to a tummy tuck if desired and/or liposuction of localized fat deposits that are resistant to a healthy diet and regular exercise. These procedures are intended to eliminate slackened skin as well as reduce stretch marks and pregnancy fat.

Pregnancy affects each woman differently, with age and genetics playing a role in how the body recovers. Some women easily get their pre-pregnancy bodies back when they have completed childbearing. However, most women have permanent changes after pregnancy, such as stretch marks, breast deflation or drooping, extra abdominal skin and/or loss of abdominal muscle tone, known as “rectus diastasis”“(permanent separation of the rectus abdominis muscles). Repeated pregnancies and magnify these changes.

Most of these changes to a mother’s body cannot be fully corrected by diet and exercise, or by lifestyle choices. This article will review the surgical options available for moms to rejuvenate their bodies when they have finished childbearing.

BREAST REJUVENATION

Breast Lift (Mastopexy)

Pregnancy and breastfeeding contribute to deflation and drooping of the breasts. Natural loss of skin elasticity with age, gravity and other factors such as weight loss permanently affects the shape and firmness of the breasts.

A breast lift, or mastopexy, reshapes the breast, removes excess skin, lifts breast tissue and moves the nipples and areolae to a more youthful position. The areola is often reduced in size as well. In some instances, an implant is also inserted at the same time to achieve more projection and volume with the lift. While these are all physical results that occur from breast lift surgery, what breast lifts really do is help a patient feel better about their feminine shape and contour.

Incision lines are permanent, but are generally hidden in the breast crease, at the junction of the areola and breast skin, with a vertical scar beneath the areola. Surgery takes two to three hours on average and may be done as an outpatient procedure (no overnight stay).

Breast Lift, Dr. Horton

Image from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), 2007.

Usually, suction drains are placed to gently remove wound fluid. These small tubes are in place for up to a week after surgery, and are painlessly removed in the office. Dissolving sutures (stitches) are generally used for all types of plastic surgery, with suture knots trimmed in the office at two weeks.

Breast lift side effects can include temporary discomfort, bruising, and swelling. Breasts may be temporarily numb, and healing skin may look and feel dry. Scars fade over the first year, and scar therapy is initiated at a few weeks after surgery to help flatten and fade scars while they are maturing over the first year. Fortunately, scars are in locations easily concealed by clothing, even low-cut necklines and swim suits.

Results of a breast lift are permanent. However, gravity, weight changes and age will continue to act on the breasts, as in all areas of the body and can create the need for eventual revision after many years.

Breast Augmentation

Augmentation of the breast (a “boob job”) consists of insertion of a prosthesis (implant) inside the breast to enlarge the breast or to add volume that has been lost after pregnancy or breastfeeding. The implant expands the breast area to give a fuller breast (increased cup size), give a better contour, and more cleavage that before surgery. A good Plastic Surgeon will emphasize realistic results and help you choose a shape and size that is safe and healthy for your height and frame.

Breast Augmentation, Dr. Horton

Image from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), 2007.

Implants can be filled with either saline (salt water) or silicone gel, and can be smooth-shelled or textured, round or shaped, with low-, medium-, or high-projection, and come in a variety of sizes. Breast implants are inserted through a variety of incisions, most hidden in natural creases of the body. They may also be placed either in the subglandular position (beneath the breast tissue) or submuscular position (behind the breast tissue and pectoralis major muscle).

Your Plastic Surgeon will explain in detail the many options available for breast implants, and the advantages and disadvantages of each type. Surgery takes one to two hours on average, and is often done as outpatient procedure. If other procedures are done at the same time (tummy tuck, liposuction), an overnight stay is often recommended for safety and comfort.

Breast implants are safe, and are the most extensively tested medical device available. Temporary symptoms after surgery can include discomfort, bruising, soreness, swelling, temporary change in nipple sensation and breast sensitivity. You can still have mammograms with implants in place; the technician will perform special views to ensure all breast tissue is properly evaluated. There has been a significant amount of controversy over the use of silicone in breast implants, with sensationalization of these devices by the media.

Breast Reduction

A breast reduction treats typical symptoms of hypermastia such as back pain, neck or shoulder pain, shoulder grooving, rashes beneath the breasts, and inability to fit clothing or to do physical activities due to the large size of the breasts. The size of the breasts can be reduced by up to half their volume.

The breasts are automatically lifted, and the nipple and areola are lifted to a higher position. The areola diameter is also usually reduced. Liposuction of fat rolls at the side of the breasts or in the armpit area may also be recommended to best improve the breasts’ contour.

Breast Reduction, Dr. Horton

Image from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), 2007.

The scars from breast reduction are generally the same as for a breast lift. Based on symptoms arising from large breasts, insurance companies may cover part or all of the costs of surgery. Your Plastic Surgeon will evaluate whether a breast reduction is medically indicated and will contact your insurance company to request pre-authorization for surgery when appropriate.

What to Expect after Breast Surgery

After all types of breast surgery, mild swelling of the breasts and mild discomfort can be expected for a week or two. Physical restrictions include avoiding lifting more than five pounds for two to three weeks. You may resume most normal activities, including mild exercise, after a few weeks. Sexual activity should be avoided for one to two weeks.

TUMMY CONTOURING PROCEDURES

Tummy Tuck (Abdominoplasty)

An abdominoplasty, or “tummy tuck” enhances the body contour by making the abdomen firmer and flatter by removing extra tissue. Lower abdominal skin and fat is permanently removed, creating a scar that lies in the panty line and extends from hip to hip. The belly button is also relocated to a normal position on the abdominal wall, creating a small scar around the navel.

A tummy tuck also tightens the muscles of the abdominal wall that have been weakened or separated by pregnancy by way of “rectus plication” (internal corseting sutures). A tummy tuck can remove some stretch marks, especially those located below the navel.

Tummy Tuck, Dr. Horton

Image from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), 2007.

Other procedures such as liposuction are sometimes performed together with a tummy tuck to best improve the contour of the abdomen, and to recreate a well-defined waistline in a single procedure.

Mini-Abdominoplasty

Often, if there is only a small amount of excess fat in the lower abdominal region, a “mini-abdominoplasty” is recommended. A mini-tummy tuck subtly raises excess fat and skin below the belly button, creating a more appropriately contoured lower abdomen. The mini-tummy tuck targets the lower part of the tummy, and is especially beneficial to women whose lower abdominal muscles have been weakened by pregnancy.

Scars are shorter, the belly button is not moved, and recovery time can often be shorter. The muscles can also be tightened during a mini-tummy tuck, though not quite as effectively as during a full tuck.

Recovery from Tummy Tuck

Usually an overnight stay is recommended after a tummy tuck if it is combined with other plastic surgery procedures. Tummy tuck side effects include temporary discomfort, swelling, bruising. Excessive bending and high-impact physical activity (including very active sexual activity) should be avoided for up to four to six weeks. Small drainage tubes will be in place for one to two weeks, and are painlessly removed in the office. Often, an abdominal binder (stretchy girdle-like garment) is worn for up to two months to help decrease swelling and encourage skin contraction. Scar therapy, like for breast surgery, is often initiated to decrease the appearance of scars.

BODY CONTOURING

Liposuction is a technique used to decrease local fat deposits in areas such as the hips, inner or outer thighs, abdomen, flanks, back or neck. Excess fat is permanently removed using a special wand called a cannula and a vacuum to create a smoother, more attractive body contour and better self image.

In this technique, tumescent fluid containing normal saline (sterile saltwater), epinephrine/adrenaline (to shrink blood vessels and decrease bruising and bleeding) and lidocaine local anesthetic (to numb the area) is injected through small incisions. The liposuction cannula is then inserted and fat is gradually removed until the contour of the area being treated is improved. Some liposuction machines make use of ultrasound to melt the fat before it is removed; others use a power-assisted handle to decrease surgeon fatigue.

Liposuction, Dr. Horton

Image from the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), 2007.

A compression garment is then applied to gently compress the area and to encourage skin contraction and decrease swelling. Garments are generally worn for up to six weeks. You can return to light activities within a few days and to normal activities within about two weeks. Bruising, swelling and soreness may occur for a least a few weeks. Swelling generally subsides within six weeks, and the final contour is evident by three months.

Good candidates for liposuction include women who are of average weight with firm, elastic skin, and who are in good overall health. Liposuction treats only concentrated pockets of fat that do not respond well to diet and exercise, and is not a weight-loss method. Liposuction should only be done after your ideal body weight has been most closely achieved through diet and exercise.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR IN A PLASTIC SURGEON

Any cosmetic surgery is a major procedure. It is important that all women seeking a Mommy Makeover understand that risks attend even minor procedures. There is no guarantee that the effects will be exactly as you might envision. The best assurance you have for a reliable outcome is to choose an experienced Plastic Surgeon who is Board Certified and has experience and expertise with the procedure(s) you are interested in.

Your surgeon’s specific training and judgment will help to determine which procedures best meet your goals, while minimizing complications and ensuring the best possible outcome. There should be a good “fit” in personality between you and your surgeon, with effective communication, and a trusting relationship between the two of you. Visit a number of Plastic Surgeons for a consultation until you feel you have found the very best fit for you!

A Word of Caution

There have been an overwhelming number of television shows highlighting some of the procedures offered by “cosmetic surgeons”. Not all of these surgeons are Board-Certified, and some are not formally trained in Plastic Surgery. It is important to do your research prior to committing to any surgery.

Your Plastic Surgeon should be Board-Certified in Plastic Surgery by the American Board of Surgery or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Checking professional association websites such as the American Society of Plastic Surgeons is often a good resource for background information.

SUMMARY

With all these options available, and increasing awareness of plastic surgical procedures, why don’t all women seek a Mommy Makeover? Some women are worried about focusing on themselves, rather than their families. However, many women realize the importance of focusing on both family and themselves!

Moms should wait at least six months after completing their last pregnancy and breastfeeding before considering any surgical procedure. Women should be in good physical shape – a healthy diet and regular exercise regime should be optimized for at least six months before surgery. Smoking should be absolutely eliminated for at least six weeks before elective surgery, and alcohol should be in moderation.

How you feel about yourself as a mother and a woman is integral to the strength of your family. It is not self-centered or vain to take care of yourself or to want to feel youthful, sexy and self-confident. Having a positive self-image certainly benefits you, but it also can improve your interactions with loved ones. You may be a Mommy, but never forget that you are still your own person.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dr. Karen Horton, Plastic SurgeonDr. Karen Horton is one member of a unique all-woman Plastic Surgery practice, “Women’s Plastic Surgery” in San Francisco.

Dr. Horton is a Board-Certified Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgeon. Her special training and interests include reconstruction of the breast following breast cancer, reconstructive microsurgery and cosmetic surgery of the breast and body, including the “Mommy Makeover”.

She has published review book chapters on breast reconstruction and presented numerous clinical papers at national and international scientific meetings. In addition to participating as an active member of many professional associations, she serves as a mentor to young female surgeons and medical students in training. To contact Dr. Karen Horton or learn more about the doctor, please visit her Make Me Heal Profile

Share Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • Live
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Slashdot
  • NewsVine
  • BlinkList
  • Netvouz
  • Furl
none

Fraxel Laser: Ten Years Younger In Ten Days

Posted on September 11th, 2008 in Plastic Surgeon Articles & Interviews by Makemeheal.com Staff

By Michael A. Persky, M.D., F.A.C.S.

Fraxel re:pair is the newest and most innovative laser skin rejuvenative system to hit the market in the history of lasers. What is Fraxel re:pair? It is a fractionated carbon dioxide (CO2) laser developed by Reliant Technologies, Inc. in Mountain View, CA. Reliant is the pioneer laser company in “fractionated” laser technology. Three years ago they introduced the first fractionated laser, Fraxel 750, followed by Fraxel SR1500, Fraxel re:store, Fraxel re:fine, and now Fraxel re:pair. Fraxel re:pair treatment is able to correct sagging and loose skin of the face, jowls, and especially the neck in a single quick office treatment. It smoothes wrinkles, even the difficult “bar code lines” of the upper lip. Eyelids become more youthful, “crow feet” fade. As a stand alone treatment around the eyes, it many times yields results comparable to eyelid surgery. It treats bothersome brown “sun damage” spots and freckles, as well as the brown pigment of melasma (light brown facial discoloration associated with pregnancy and birth control pills). Reddish “vascular” blemishes improve. It is especially effective in the treatment of scarring, including acne scarring. Stubborn acne scarred skin smoothes and has improvement in color.

Fraxel Laser

Fraxel re:pair has been tested over the past 2 ½ years on over 500 patients nationwide without significant complications seen with older traditional CO2 lasers. The gold standard for laser skin rejuvenation in the past has been these CO2 lasers. CO2 laser treatments were very popular 10-15 years ago, and are still available today. The problem with the “old” CO2 laser is that it removes 100% of the top 3 millimeters of facial skin. This results in a long period of recovery that includes 7-10 days of open, weeping wounds, and then months of fading from red to pink skin. The complications of the total CO2 treatment included hypopigmentation (the skin was lighter in the treated area than the surrounding area), scarring, and persistent erythema (redness). Plus, only the facial skin could be treated because neck skin was too thin to take 100% CO2. Some of the worst scarring resulted from ill-advised neck treatments. Therefore even in treatments where the face had an excellent result, the neck still looked darker, wrinkled, and older in appearance.

The engineers, scientists, and physicians at Reliant Technologies, Inc. have taken the powerful effects of the CO2 laser, and enabled us to be able to treat skin in a fractionated fashion. This means that instead of treating 100% of the skin and removing the entire surface, we can now treat anywhere from 5% to 70% of the skin, leaving normal skin in between the laser hits to facilitate the healing process. The laser beam width is one tenth the diameter of a hair follicle, yet capable of penetrating through and vaporizing to a depth of 17 millimeters of skin. Patients are seeing even greater tightening of the skin than with the old traditional CO2 lasers. This effect is thought to be due to the five to six times deeper skin penetration with Fraxel re:pair (compared to the 3 millimeter depth of the old CO2 laser).

Fraxel re:pair is capable of treating off face as well without the complications of hypopigmentation and scarring that were seen with traditional CO2 lasers. The areas of skin that are not hit by the laser rapidly fill in the areas of laser vaporization. When magnified, the skin is seen to shrink during the treatment. The skin is completely re-epithelialized within 36 to 48 hours depending upon the aggressiveness of the treatment (i.e. depth and percentage of skin treated). The upper eyelids, neck, and chest have been safely treated with Fraxel re:pair. Patients commonly return to our office saying that friends and relatives are telling them that they look healthy and rested. Studies are currently being conducted on the safety and efficacy of treating hands, arms, and stretch marks. Early results are very positive and promising.

Fraxel Laser, Before, After

(Left: Before, Right: After)

Fraxel Laser, Repair

(Left: Before, Right: After)

How long do the results last? That is always a funny question in facial plastic surgery because as time goes by, the aging process continues. Unless you are Dorian Gray, you will continue to age. It is thought that similar to our experience with the standard CO2 laser, re:pair results will be long term. It may be that a maintenance treatment will be helpful 5, or 10, or even 15 years after the initial treatment. What is known for sure is that the patient’s skin will continually look more youthful than if they had not been treated. I currently tell my patients that they may need to have another treatment in 5 to 10 years. Fraxel re:pair is thought to be a “pre-emptive strike” against aging, and against a face lift. Theoretically, in some patients, the tightening and contracting of excess skin may be enough to avoid surgery entirely. Studies have shown that up to 8 grams of skin are removed in a single treatment. Re:pair is great for those patients showing the early signs of aging who want to improve their appearance, yet who are not candidates for face or neck lifts. It is also great in older patients with loose, sagging skin. Skin color and texture improve as well.

What is involved in the treatment? Every patient is shown photographs of previously treated patients to give them a most accurate expectation of what they will look like and go through from the day of through the weeks after the treatment. An anesthetic gel is placed on the areas to be treated for about 1 hour. Most patients are given Xanax for relaxation and Vicodin for analgesia. The procedure is performed in the treatment room (for patients who do not want to feel a thing, the treatment can be performed under IV sedation with Diprovan in a surgery center). The numbing gel is removed. Some patients get an injection of Demerol immediately prior to treatment. A local anesthetic “nerve block” may or may not be given. If the upper eyelids are included in the treatment, corneal protectors are placed. The Fraxel re: pair treatment on the face takes about 20-30 minutes, the neck takes about 15 minutes. At the completion of the treatment, Aquaphor ointment is applied to the treated areas. The face appears red, swollen, and there are pin point areas of blood for a few hours. Amazingly, there is no pain during the recovery period. Patients are directed to go home, close their blinds and curtains, avoid sunlight, and follow their post-treatment instructions.

During the first 2 to 3 days, patients wash their face with a soft wash cloth with a very mild cleanser every few hours. They then briefly soak in a dilute Acetic Acid solution (8 oz. of water with a teaspoon of vinegar). Aquaphor gel is then reapplied. This continues until the skin is re-epithelialized. Usually by the third day, the skin is dry, tight, and can feel mildly itchy. At this point, generous application of gentle moisturizer and when out sun block is essential. Likewise, avoiding the sun as much as possible helps to decrease the chances of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation. The skin is dry, flaky, and red to pinkish for the next 3 days. At one week after the treatment patients appear pink. We recommend Jane Iredale mineral make-up specifically matched to the patient’s skin color. At this time patients may return to their normal activities. Depending upon the strength of the treatment and the individual healing tendencies of the patient, it may take another 1 to 3 weeks until the skin returns to its’ normal color. Patients are encouraged to protect the investment that they have made in their treatment by using effective skin care products afterwards. We recommend SkinMedica, Nia-24, and ReVale skin lines.

Many patients ask whether they should have a face/neck lift or Fraxel re:pair. If there is excessive skin then surgery is indicated. In the majority of patients, the ultimate appearance is better with Fraxel re:pair, as there is not only tightening of the facial and neck skin, but the overall healthy result on the skin cannot be obtained with surgery. Some patients have upper and/or lower eyelid surgery under local anesthesia in the office concurrent with their Fraxel re:pair treatment. Fraxel re:pair is limited in the treatment of very deep lines at the lower corners of the mouth, and in eliminating “marionette” lines of the lower mouth. It helps minimally with “jowling”, but will not get rid of jowls.

Patients must take their treatment seriously and follow their treatment instructions both pre- and post-procedure. Some patients receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy, while others have Gentle Waves LED light therapy to speed the healing process.

Fractional CO2 laser skin rejuvenation is where facial cosmetic surgery is heading for at least the next ten years. There were 2 or 3 laser companies with fractional CO2 at the beginning of 2008. By 2009 there will be over 12 companies launching their version of Fraxel. The advantage of Fraxel re:pair over the current similar lasers and the many to soon be released is Fraxel’s research over the past 4 years. As of June 2008, Fraxel re:pair had 27 published research articles in peer reviewed scientific journals while the next closest competitor had only 1 article. Fraxel is the only laser that is applied to the skin in a continuous roller fashion while all other laser use a “stamping” application that is less consistent, only more time consuming. Fraxel is the technology that other laser companies are racing to match.

The cost of the procedure varies depending upon the areas treated, the geographic location, and the experience/qualifications of the treating physician. The cost ranges from $2500 to $7500. The cost is a fraction of the cost of similar surgical procedures.

I am fortunate to be the only facial plastic surgeon in Southern California to offer all three of the currently available Fraxel laser treatments. Fraxel re:fine provides safe, gentle resurfacing for patients in their 20’s and 30’s. You can prevent or address the first signs of aging, such as fine lines and mild pigment problems without downtime. Fraxel re:store treatment offers patients in their 30’s, 40’s and 50’s a noninvasive solution to wrinkles around the eyes, acne scars and brown spots, helping the skin to regain its youthful glow. Fraxel re:pair treatment is designed for patients in their late 30’s to 70’s looking for a preemptive strike to treat deeper wrinkles and skin laxity without a surgical facelift.

Your physician should be expert in CO2 laser technology, and the more experience, the better. It is very important that patients choose their treating physician very carefully to avoid potential problems. Fraxel re:pair is an extremely powerful laser. When used properly it has been shown to be extremely effective and safe in creating